tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12795142.post8942834449353588794..comments2009-02-24T03:49:08.022ZComments on where's me country?: Critical PhilosophyCianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14103748028384262474noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12795142.post-21004556261922309492009-02-24T03:49:00.000Z2009-02-24T03:49:00.000ZIts nearly 20 years since I did Philosophy and Eng...Its nearly 20 years since I did Philosophy and English in UCD. Don't tell me they are still peddling the same rubbish. I despair for you. I struggled through it as well: Foucault, Ricouer, Derrida, et al. Got excited about it for a little while. Then I got on with my life. I recently met some tosser who told me he was a "post-christian" and thought Derrida was the best argument to be born again. Yes, he was American. Personally, I think the whole Post-modern shlock is just jargon ridden Nostradamus. People will be getting worked up over that sophistry for years. I did like the Anglo-American stuff: especially Wittgenstein. Much more rigorous. If I were young and back again I would go and learn something real: like welding or carpentry. I would probably be wealthier now if I had.RonanODhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16071056478549745053noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12795142.post-23995440165739662982008-12-15T23:46:00.000Z2008-12-15T23:46:00.000ZHi Cian,I'd have to form an opinion first. No sens...Hi Cian,<BR/><BR/>I'd have to form an opinion first. No sense pretending :)<BR/><BR/>I agree with what you say. As a man of the IT world, I have a trade steeped to the eyebrows in jargon. It's pretty damn lonely. <BR/><BR/>Philosophy would do well to be a bit more user-friendly!Shtantohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07657279939290958519noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12795142.post-24733637140041447632008-06-27T08:32:00.000+01:002008-06-27T08:32:00.000+01:00I have started to think that Foucoult is useless f...I have started to think that Foucoult is useless for argumentation, the tedious Constructivists that hang around everywhere, it seems like there is always one hanging around every conversation. All he ever wanted was to be a goldfish. spoofer.Vhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03321340231965355160noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12795142.post-782250600967619182007-06-18T23:33:00.000+01:002007-06-18T23:33:00.000+01:00Hi cian, thats a good blog you have going, i recen...Hi cian, thats a good blog you have going, i recently set up my own.Chris Bondhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357694680436140551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12795142.post-45871297015364712222007-05-18T15:29:00.000+01:002007-05-18T15:29:00.000+01:00you sound like a man in the know. where can I find...you sound like a man in the know. where can I find english translations of Jules Lequier, Georges Palante or/and Louis Guilloux (black blood). My french is not so passable!<BR/>thank you (especially if you can help!zinniahttp://kerryview.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12795142.post-75181287343014225932007-02-13T23:06:00.000Z2007-02-13T23:06:00.000ZDid you ever read the Alan Sokal book, Intellectua...Did you ever read the Alan Sokal book, Intellectual Impostures? It's a bit harsh on much post-modernism, but there's a grain of truth in there.WorldbyStormhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15362482364984333707noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12795142.post-15333636006547365742007-02-07T23:00:00.000Z2007-02-07T23:00:00.000ZI absolutely agree, the recent past is indelibly m...I absolutely agree, the recent past is indelibly marked by their work. Your point about meaning is perhaps a better way of my own regarding the seeming tension between radical interpretations and perspectives and their failure to radicalise those who require emancipation.<br /><br />All of the above have undoubted moments of brilliance, yet they couch it within a great deal of jargon laden philosophy. <br /><br />I struggle to see how postmodernism gets such credit for the fall of entire cultures (or other awful claims it gets). It is at heart (to my mind at least) that most modern of elements-the anti-thesis.<br /><br />perhaps I am wrong. <br /><br />I realise it is simplistic but it is not a system of beliefs (anathema to the idea in fact) rather a system of critical reflection and interpretation of what it is that has taken place. It doesnt disclose through its presence a great deal, it simply acts to subvert, critique and perfect what precedes and co exists with it as well as exploring new ways to generate ideas.Cianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14103748028384262474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12795142.post-540655470991197072007-02-07T22:21:00.000Z2007-02-07T22:21:00.000ZI think Derrida and Foucault are interesting in so...I think Derrida and Foucault are interesting in so far as they expand on certain concepts of 'discourse', but yes, it is jargon heavy, close to solipsistic and in many respects there is more than a hint of elitism about their positioning of themselves as interpreters of meaning...<br /><br />...on the other hand it's crucial to engage with it, even if one disagrees with the ideas behind it if only to understand a part of the trajectory of our culture over the past two or three decades.WorldbyStormhttp://cedarlounge.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.com